SECTION FIVE
sm
COLUMN
SIXTY-SIX, DECEMBER 1, 2001
(Copyright © 2001 Al Aronowitz)
FAITH OF WHOSE FATHERS?
There is a famous song
called, In My Liverpool Home, which makes reference to the fact that
there are two Cathedrals in the city. One of them, the home of the Anglican
faith, is one of the biggest churches in the world, and is the epitome of the
medieval concept of religious buildings. Like a red sandstone mountain, it
imposes itself on the skyline---an urban Everest, a soaring testimony to the
Omnipresence of God and his heaven.
The Catholic Metropolitan Cathedral, by contrast, is an ultra modern
design of concrete and glass, which, because of its cone shaped design, is
nicknamed "Paddy's Wigwam."
This is a reference to
the influence of the Irish Catholic population of the city on the Mersey. It
could also, obliquely
perhaps, be an acknowledgement of the fact that earlier Liverpool Irish
Catholics had tried several times to build a Cathedral in the grand style, but,
because of their relative impoverishment within the Protestant state, which
denied them access to government funds, had been forced to settle for something
which in essence is little more than a concrete canopy, a pre-stressed tepee to
shelter the faithful from those prairie-like winds which rage across the Irish
Sea.
By and large the
population of Liverpool is roughly divided between Protestants and Catholics,
with a fairly strong Jewish presence. I was one of the Catholic elect, not by
choice, as nobody asked me for my opinion on the matter, and even if they had I
could not, at the age of fourteen days, have been able to articulate a reasoned
response. So it was that I became a member of that strain of Liverpudlians who
go by the epithets, "left footer? or "Cogger." Had it been left to me I
would have formed my own church, the Uni-Humanitarian Church of Huyton, based on
the idea of having one member only, namely me.
A few years ago I came
across a discarded school copy of Thomas Hardy's Tess of the D'Urbervilles
and inside the fly-leaf was the name of its owner. I recognised the unusual name
as belonging to a recently deceased local man and, thinking that it would cheer
up his bereaved family to have something from their father's childhood, I
approached his daughter, a Junoesque woman with an affected Bonhomie, and
offered her the volume. She took one look at the name of the school where it
came from, which happened to be Protestant, and almost threw it at me, snapping
loudly:
"Nothing to do with us! We're Catholics here!"
As she stalked away I felt a surge of anger at her irrational and
ignorant response over my genuine mistake. I wanted to shout at her that for the
two weeks before I was christened a Catholic I was just another human being and
that appendage would always be my preferred label. In the event I simply walked
away and reflected on how little control we have over our mortal destiny. As if
it isn't bad enough that theologians assert that our lives are divinely mapped
out long before our birth we have to have our earthly fate pre-determined by
people who for the most part are simply adhering to some long forgotten
quasi-tribal ritual. Why aren't we allowed to reach an age where we can choose
our own religion, just as we choose our soccer teams, pubs or political parties?
However, this is a chicken and egg question as one's religion often determines
one's secular choices.
I ask this question because, as someone living in a city that admits of
multi denominations, the fact of being attached to one or the other, however
loosely, can have profound repercussions on one's life.
My worst memories of Catholicism are of the incense that pervaded both
the church and my empty stomach, which was in those days a pre-requisite of
attending the Sacrament of Holy Communion, and was guaranteed to induce a strong
sense of nausea. Nor can I forget the bare and plank like kneelers, which cut
into my knees like an avenging an Angel's knife, or the green baize covered
dishes which were passed along the rows to enable people to deposit whatever
cash they could afford. The baize ensured that all the coins made the same muted
sound and so the poor need not feel embarrassed as they donated their pennies
and half pennies. This cosmic tax was yet another consequence Catholicism of
being treated by the Anglican state as an alien religion and as such unworthy of
state funds. I still resent the meagre donations made by my mother, which often
meant that Sundays were truly days of rest because we didn't have any money left
to do anything else.
My personal relations with the clergy were also clouded with resentment, because my first knowledge of betrayal was not just that committed by Judas, but also by Father Lawn, a tall spare martinet of a man who single-handedly quashed any faith I might have had in his ministry. It happened during my preparation for that beautiful right of passage known by Catholics as the "First Holy communion."
Why
can't kids choose their own religions like they choose what teams
to root for?
For weeks we had been preparing for the day when we would first of all
confess and purge ourselves of sin, before partaking of the Body of Christ. This
involved making mock confessions, so as to get used to the ritual. We had been
told incessantly that our confessions would be secret and we, as individuals,
would always remain anonymous except to God. On my final mock confession I had
barely got two 'sins? past the prescribed introduction---
"Bless me father for
I have sinned?"
---before Father Lawn yanked back the curtain and barked something. I
don't remember what I'd said, as I was so shocked to see him face to raging face
that my mind went blank. What on earth could a child of eight have possibly done
that was so wrong that warranted the smashing of a sacred promise? The fact was,
the priest had recognised me and so the erosion of my faith had begun.
So I was, for the following seven years of schooling at least, locked
into a belief system in which I had no faith. My mock confession had somehow
made a mockery of faith. After that day religion was just something I had to do,
like Maths or Algebra, only with markedly less enthusiasm. My faith was further
eroded by our yearly observance of the ceremony known as the Stations of the
Cross, when groups of us would pause and contemplate before the plaster
enactment of Christ's agony and crucifixion.
You see, every year I would wait for my benevolent God to intervene and
save his son Jesus from torture and death, and every year I was mortally
disappointed when I reached the scene where his crushed and bleeding body was
patently beyond rescue. My infant belief system was tossed and blown by the same
storm that rocked Golgotha at the hour of the Messiah's death.
In the late seventies I found myself idly watching a television
programme about a Jewish Yeshiva, where young people are introduced to their
religion. I was struck by the way they went about examining their texts. First,
they began by scrutinising a single piece of scripture, and then that was
overlaid by a larger piece, which fitted around the original like a border. This
process of adding "borders? continued until the students were discussing a
series of texts that were about the size of a paving stone. Each scripture was
debated and argued about in relation to the others and as I watched, by then
fascinated, a thought flashed through my mind:
"Was this why many
of the great dissidents of history were Jews?"
Was this process of evaluation, which encouraged dispute and argument,
the reason why Moses had turned his face against the calf worshipping majority?
Was this why Jesus had opposed the ruling Sadducees at the cost of his own life?
Was this why Marx had rebelled against the prevailing system of exchange and
Einstein against the monolith of Newtonian physics? Were they rebels because the
way they had learned their religion somehow encouraged dissent, by demonstrating
that the cosmology of Judaism was big enough to allow disagreement?
I couldn't help but recall my childhood that had been spent learning,
by rote, the articles of faith enshrined in the catechism, that slim volume that
purported to contain all that I needed to know about my universe and my place in
it. If we had any questions about the contradictions that were apparent even to
children there was no point in asking them. The answers were all in the book,
which between its soft blue cover held the numerically ordered answers to keep
us ciphers rigidly in check.
Now I don't want to become a Jew, I value what I was born with too much for that, and in any case I am against any form of ritual mutilation of children, male or female. I might add that I am equally opposed to psychic mutilation, which is the norm for most religious practice. Funny thing, my priests and teachers were always exhorting me to be like Jesus, but they never mentioned he was circumcised. Typically Catholic not to mention anything connected with sexuality, despite their having a category of sin known as a 'sin of omission." ##
CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMN SIXTY-SIX
CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX
OF COLUMNS
The
Blacklisted Journalist can be contacted at P.O.Box 964, Elizabeth, NJ 07208-0964
The Blacklisted Journalist's E-Mail Address:
info@blacklistedjournalist.com
THE BLACKLISTED JOURNALIST IS A SERVICE MARK OF AL ARONOWITZ