SECTION NINETEEN
EMAIL PAGE SEVEN 

sm
COLUMN
EIGHTY-EIGHT, APRIL 1, 2003
(Copyright © 2003 The Blacklisted Journalist)
AN E FROM CHINA
Subject:        Re: HOW ARE YOU?
   Date:        Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:52:11 폍 (CST)
   From: wenca@mail.sc.cninfo.net 
     To:        al aronowitz info@blacklistedjournalist.com 
Hi  dear Al , 
Glad to hear fromm you,  how are you getting along , and miss you and Ida  very much . 
I had an five week academic trip to Canada in May last year invited by Canadian Embassy in Beijing  and also i
had 2 month's academic trip in Hong Kong University from 12, 2002-- 2 , 2003 , and now am at Chengdu
with new semester . I am all right with both  my teaching and  beat studies----edited  the first Chinese
edition X-rays America : Ginsberg Forum , a  critical essays collections on Allen , also mu own collection of beat
studies over years ---the two volumes were published 2002 .My project in HK is  The Beat Generation and Eastern
Religion -- I am to write books on Beats in the years to come . 
Sorry  for not sending you Christmas greetings while I was in HK . WE are  very  much concerned about the War
against Iraq from Bush adminisration,  you are right to say that way , i am sure Allen would
seand up against  Bush's policy as he did in '60s against The War in Vietnam . It is hard to
predict the future---what happens to the world if the war breaks out ,I am afraid --- America will not be
as safe as it can
hope  for its potential enemies. Islamic world and other places would take all means to revenge , How is the
general attitude for Americans at this moment " 
WE are watching what would happen for that matter.  However, hoping you and
Ida all right in everything. 
Tell me something about you and Ida , Keep contact and all the  best wishes from
Chu-an  ##
* * *
PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS FEEL
ENDANGERED
Subject:        Fwd: article/letter for publication
   Date:        Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:46:47 -0800
   From:        Abe Ata awa@clyde.its.unimelb.edu.au 
     To: info@blacklistedjournalist.com 
    Exodus of the    Palestinian Christians 
    The Palestinian Christian is an endangered species. When the modern    state of Israel was established, there
were about 400000 of us. Two years    ago the number was down to 80000. Now it�s down to 60000. At that
    rate, in a few years there will be none of us left. Palestinian Christians within Israel fare little better. On the face of it, their    number has grown by 20000 since 1991. But this is misleading, for the    census classification
"Christian" includes some 20000 recent non-Arab    migrants from the former Soviet Union.    So why are Palestinian Christians abandoning their homeland? 
We have lost hope, that's why. We are treated as non-people. Few outside the Middle East even know we exist, and those who do, conveniently forget. I refer, of course, to the American Religious Right. They see the modern Israel as a harbinger of the Second Coming, at which time Christians will go to Paradise, and all others (presumably including Jews) to Hell. To this end they lend military and moral support to Israel. Even by the double-dealing standards of international diplomacy this is a breathtakingly cynical bargain. It is hard to know who is using whom more: the Christian Right for offering secular power in the expectation that the Jewish state will be destroyed by a greater spiritual one; or the Israeli Right for accepting their offer. What we do know is that both sides are abusing the Palestinians.
Apparently we don't enter into anyone's    calculations.    The views of the Israeli Right are well known: they want us gone.    Less well known are the views of the American Religious Right. Senator     James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) said:
"God Appeared to Abraham and    said: 'I am giving you this land,' the West Bank. This is not a political
    battle at all. It is a contest over whether or not the word of God is true." 
    House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas) was even more forthright: "I'm content to have Israel grab the entire West
Bank. I happen to    believe that the Palestinians should leave." 
    There is a phrase for this. Ethnic cleansing.    So why do American Christians stand by while their leaders advocate the     expulsion of fellow Christians? Could it be that they do not know that the    Holy Land has been a home to Christians since,
well---since Christ? 
    Do not think I am asking for special treatment for Christians. Ethnic     cleansing is evil whoever does it and to whomever it is done. Palestinian
Christians, Maronite Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Armenians, Baptists,
    Copts and Assyrians have been rubbing shoulders with each other and    with other
religions---Muslims, Jews, Druze and (most recently) Baha'is for    centuries. We want to do so for centuries more. But we
can't if we are
     driven out by despair. 
What we seek is support material, moral, political and spiritual. As     Palestinians we grieve for what we have lost, and few people (the     Ashkenazi Jews are one) have lost more than us. But grief can be    assuaged by the fellowship of friends. 
    (Signed: Prof. Abe W. Ata, a 9th generation Christian Palestinian born in    Bethlehem. He is the author of 11 books including
"Intermarriage between    Christians and Muslims : the case of the West Bank" 
(Melbourne, David    Lovell Publ. 2000)
a.ata@asian.unimelb.edu.au   ##
* * *
AMIRI BARAKA AT YALE
Subject:        Fwd: FW: Antisemitism at Yale
   Date:        Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:41:08 -0500
   From: KhunRum@aol.com 
     To: info@blacklistedjournalist.com 
Despicable carrying on by that Lee Roi Jones feller at George Dubya's alma mater..for shame! And them Yankees
criticize Texas.
 Subject:        FW: Antisemitism at Yale
   Date:        Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:44:48 -0600
   From:        "Hoffman, Alan, M. D." AHoffman@tmh.tmc.edu 
FYI to Christians - Hillel is a Jewish organization for college students.  I sure
hope if this every happened around here you'd all be writing protest letters. This is a repeat of antisemitic history that the Jews shouldn't have to fight
against alone.   More and more college campuses are having this kind of problems (even with faculty members).  It's a repeat of Germany in the
1930's and must never be tolerated.  Our kids (both Jewish and Christian) need to
know how to organize coalitions to counter this evil. 
 Posy
  ------ HF: HILLEL-FACULTY ------- 
                  campus-level Jewish issues &views 
  Ranting Poet's Visit Makes For a Disturbing Week at Yale 
  By James Kirchick, Forward, March 7, 2003 
  As Yale Daily News columnist Eli Muller put it last Friday, "It has been  an unpleasant week to be Jewish at Yale." 
  The trouble started when the university's Afro-American Cultural Center decided  to host controversial poet Amiri Baraka for a reading and discussion of his  poem, "Somebody Blew Up America." In that now infamous work, the poet  laureate of New Jersey suggested that Israel had prior knowledge of the  September 11 terrorist attacks and warned 4,000 of its citizens not to show up  to work in the World Trade Center that day.  (Interestingly, he doesn't have  an answer for why some Israelis and other Jews died on 9-11.) 
  Here at Yale, the Jewish community on campus reacted with panic and  downright anger to news of Baraka's invitation. Why would the  African-American community invite such a hatemonger to campus? How could  we respond effectively without appearing to be advocating censorship? What  would this event do to black-Jewish relations on campus? 
  All weekend before the February 24 event, the Yale Friends of Israel e-mail list  was more active than ever before, with all sorts of protest strategies being  offered up by students. Yet despite objections from Hillel, Jewish students and  concerned alumni, the African-American center decided to proceed with  Baraka. 
  As a columnist for the Yale Daily News, I attended the Amiri Baraka affair, and  it was one of the most disturbing events in my entire life. It was not Baraka's  ranting that upset me most. Having read his work, I was thoroughly prepared for  whatever was bound to come out of his mouth. 
  What shocked me was the response he received from my fellow Yale students.  As he offered "evidence" of Israeli foreknowledge of the World Trade Center  attacks, many Yale students vigorously nodded their heads in approval and  erupted into cheering. At the end of the event, the crowd leapt to its feet to give  the poet a rousing standing ovation.  (How quickly they've forgotten that the  Jews helped them so much in the 1960's to gain their civil rights.)
  Midway through his diatribe, Baraka spotted my skeptical expression. He  loudly declared that I had "constipation of the face," and thus required a "brain  enema." 
  An avowed communist, Baraka drew laughs from the crowd when he  affectionately quoted Mao Tse-tung on the topic of public integrity. 
  "No investigation, no right to speak," he chanted. The audience loudly joined  him in unison, repeating the
words of a Chinese dictator responsible for the  deaths of millions of his own people. 
  After Baraka's talk, one Yale professor lamented that so many students from  his alma mater had just been "applauding falsehoods at a university." 
  "It is confining rather than liberating for students," the professor said. "It is  anti-educational." 
  Baraka may have been greeted with thunderous ovations at the event, but the  opinion page of the Yale Daily News greeted Baraka with a stirring  condemnation of his presence on campus. The editorial board lashed out at the  African-American center in a piece titled, "Baraka's Hate Speech Has No Place  at Yale." In an opinion essay, junior Michael Anastasio dismissed Baraka as "a  man who deserves no attention at all." Jewish Chaplain Rabbi James Ponet  and University Chaplain Jerry Streets, 
himself black, raised their concern about Baraka's invective in a letter to the  editor. 
  But the war of words had just begun. 
  The day after Baraka's speech, the Yale Daily News ran an opinion article by  Pamela George, assistant dean of Yale College and director of the  Afro-American Cultural Center. In her essay, which she had already e-mailed a  day earlier to those who objected to the poet's visit, she conflated criticism of  the Baraka invitation with censorship: "The Afro-American Cultural Center at  Yale and the Black Student Alliance at Yale declare their belief in the  importance of free speech as a fundamental tenet of the university." 
  George did not stop with her criticism of those who protested the decision to  invite Baraka. She also accused Jewish students of hosting a racist speaker of  their own. 
  "When an invitation was extended from a residential college at Yale to a former  Israeli general and soldier it seemed appropriate that it be protested," George  wrote, referring to Yoni Fighel, who was brought to campus by the  Anti-Defamation League and a professor for a November event. "It was appalling  to hear students share anti-Palestinian remarks at a tea with Yoni Fighel." 
  As it turned out, George did not attend the Fighel talk that she so  authoritatively railed against. Still, she saw fit to compare an Israeli  counter-terrorism expert to a man who has written, "I got  the/extermination blues,
jewboys, i got/the hitler syndrome figured." I did attend the address by Fighel, who was directly involved in the 
  implementation of the Oslo accords, and nothing that he said could even be  remotely construed as racist. It is worth noting that George only raised the  claim of racism after she and the Black Student Alliance were confronted about  their own decision to invite Baraka. 
  What has been most frustrating for myself and other Jewish students is the  task of convincing our non-Jewish colleagues that Baraka's conspiracy theories  rise above the level of mere criticism of Israel, and into the territory of  antisemitic blood libel. 
  Many non-Jews on campus have merely brushed the whole affair off as the  paranoid overreaction of the Jewish community to an irrelevant ignoramus. 
  As if the appalling display of support that Baraka received was not enough to  alarm the Jewish community, a column appearing two days later in the Yale  Daily News sealed the deal. Senior Sahm Adrangi ominously wrote that "the  Baraka controversy isn't really about free speech. It's about how special  interests manipulate the public discourse to advance their agendas." 
  Adrangi did Baraka's bidding by attacking one of his most vocal critics, the
ADL, naively labeling it as, "the Zionist group who ought to stick 'Israeli' in front  of its name (when was the last time it condemned defamation of Muslims and  Arab-Americans?)." 
  This week, the ADL's national director, Abraham Foxman, fired back with his  own essay in the Yale student newspaper, blasting Baraka and
Adrangi. Foxman also noted that his organization regularly condemns acts of
  discrimination against Muslims. 
  By the time Foxman's article arrived, Jewish students were already in a tizzy  over Adrangi's charges. Even during a nasty and protracted battle last semester  against the divestment movement, such unabashedly antisemitic sentiments  did not bubble up in the halls or cafeterias, never mind on the enlightened  pages of the nation's oldest college daily. 
  An emergency meeting was convened the same day that Adrangi's article  came out at the Slifka Center for Jewish Life. Jewish students engaged in an  emotional and at times contentious debate about what to do regarding not only  Adrangi's column, but the future of black-Jewish relations on campus. While  plans for future action remain murky, the general sentiment seemed strongly  opposed to calling for George's resignation, instead favoring unconditional  reconciliation with Yale's Black Student Alliance. 
  As of now, Yale's tightly knit Jewish community is in a state of confusion.  Mitchell Webber, a senior heading off to law school next fall, represents one of  the more aggressive viewpoints. Following the Hillel meeting, he asked, "What  good is a community that refuses to stand up for itself? I just need to keep  reminding myself that Yale's Jewish community isn't representative of American  Jews at large." 
       [Akiba Covitz of the University of Richmond sent this in.] 
             HF: HILLEL-FACULTY  Commentary and discussion             for university/college *Jewish* faculty/staff 
##
* * *
I'M APPRECIATED IN HAWAII
Subject:
You are appreciated
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:59:27 -1000
From: "Roger Sussman, Sussman Communications" rajsuss@hawaii.rr.com
To: info@blacklistedjournalist.com  
Aloha
Al-
I
have been reading your journals online recently, having happened upon them,
which was a valuable discovery.
You
sound like a good person.
I
had seen your name around for years.
I
hope this finds you well amidst all the very crazy shit flying around in this
sad world.
I
enjoy your stories, and the sense of interconnectedness they demonstrate has
been so present in your life. I, too, have felt that way much of the time in my
life, and have always much enjoyed that feeling of serendipity.
I
live with my wife River and our three boys on the wet side of Maui. .  . I'm a nut, but I'm a nice and good
nut, hanging in.
Onward...
Maybe
one of these days you will have a reason to be here on island. 
Aloha,
Roger
Sussman
Haiku, Hawaii  ##
*
* *
CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMN EIGHTY-EIGHT

CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX
OF COLUMNS
The
Blacklisted Journalist can be contacted at P.O.Box 964, Elizabeth, NJ 07208-0964
The Blacklisted Journalist's E-Mail Address:
info@blacklistedjournalist.com
 
 
THE BLACKLISTED JOURNALIST IS A SERVICE MARK OF AL ARONOWITZ